by Allison Jones
This letter was published 22 November 1787 and in it James
Madison discusses why a democratic republic is better than a straight
democracy.
“Among the numerous advantages promised by a well
constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its
tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments, never
finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he
contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice.”
Human beings do not all have the same opinions or interests;
therefore there will always be groups that agree with each other and disagree
with the others. “So strong is this
propensity of mankind to fall into mutual animosities, that where no
substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful
distinctions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions, and
excite their most violent conflicts.”
Conflict is part of human nature.
This cannot be avoided, but the effects of faction can be lessened.
Laws must be impartial, therefore those that make them must
be removed from the issues, have no personal stakes invested in the issue
considered. We cannot expect people to
be able to be impartial when personal matters, either relational or monetary,
are concerned. “It is in vain to say,
that enlightened statesmen will be able to adjust these clashing interests, and
render them all subservient to the public good.
Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm: Nor, in many
cases, can such an adjustment be made at all, without taking into view indirect
and remote considerations, which will rarely prevail over the immediate
interest which one party may find in disregarding the rights of another or the
good of the whole.”
A minority faction is kept in check by the fact that it is a
minority; it cannot force its views on the majority. But a majority faction is more
dangerous. As we cannot rely on people
to be entirely impartial or fair, we cannot trust the majority to always keep
the rights of various minority factions in mind. Just because most people want something does
not make it right. A pure democracy with
majority rule is not secure; who knows when the majority may decide that your
group should be deprived of rights.
Madison promotes republic as the cure for this issue because
it will “refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the
medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true
interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice, will be
least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations.” People vote for a representative who they
trust to make good decisions. Because
the representative is over a certain number of citizens in an area, they are
removed enough from popular passions to be impartial in most of the issues, but
still close enough to know what the values and needs of their constituents are.
A few just people can be found in the population, but we
cannot expect that of everyone. This
does imply that voters are required to research their representatives to make
sure they are in fact capable to doing their job well. We must vote for those we can trust to
research and consider the issues thoroughly and make fair laws.
No comments:
Post a Comment